Editorial Policy

We created BoostSuite because starting a business shouldn't feel like solving a puzzle with missing pieces. Our goal is simple: help entrepreneurs make smart decisions about forming and running their companies—without the usual headaches and surprises. Trust drives everything we do, which means we only recommend what we'd actually use ourselves and we're completely transparent about how we work. New to BoostSuite? Check out About Boost Suite for the full story.

How we choose and evaluate partners

Here's the thing about recommendations—they have to be earned, not bought. We'd rather have your trust than a quick commission check any day.

Selection criteria and due diligence

Before any service even gets a mention on our site, we dig deep. We look for straightforward pricing (yes, including those state fees everyone tries to hide), reliable filing processes, helpful customer support, and honest terms without sneaky fine print. But here's where it gets interesting—we actually go undercover and test these services like real founders would, from signing up to (sometimes) canceling.

Why? Because a company's marketing might sound great, but their actual process tells the real story. We document everything: exact prices with timestamps, every step of their onboarding, how long support takes to respond—then we compare all that with real user feedback from trustworthy sources. When a service gets better, we update our reviews. When they slip up, we tell you about it straight.

Independence, disclosures, and how we make money

Let's be upfront about money. Some of our recommendations include affiliate links, and if you decide to use one of those services, we might earn a commission (at no extra cost to you). This helps us keep the lights on and continue testing services, but—and this is crucial—it never influences what we recommend. We follow the FTC endorsement guidance and disclose these relationships clearly.

Our editorial team makes all the ranking and recommendation decisions independently. When we're not 100% sure about something, we test it again rather than publish a wishy-washy review. We'd rather stay quiet than guess.

Ongoing monitoring and removal

Our work doesn't stop after we publish a review. We regularly check pricing pages, terms of service, and help documentation—more frequently for companies that change things often. When we spot patterns of missed filings, hidden fees, or misleading claims, that triggers a formal review process.

If a service fails that review, we either remove it or downgrade our recommendation, and we explain exactly why on the page. Here's our promise: we'd rather lose a commission than lose your trust.

Research, verification, and quality assurance

We don't compromise on accuracy, and being clear doesn't mean being careless—we insist on both.

Source standards

We start with the official sources whenever possible. That means documents from agencies like the U.S. Small Business Administration for business structure comparisons, and IRS guidance on LLCs for tax information, EINs, and elections. We also rely heavily on state laws, Secretary of State websites, official forms, and agency announcements—because the actual law beats someone's interpretation of it.

We steer clear of anonymous blogs and unsourced claims, and we keep detailed records of every source we use. When two credible sources disagree, we point that out and explain what it means for your situation.

Fact-checking workflow

Every major guide goes through the same rigorous process: we start with a clear scope, do documented research, create a draft with citations, verify every line, get specialist review, and do a final edit. At each step, someone is specifically responsible for accuracy and completeness.

Our specialist, Aaron Kra, reviews high-stakes content by questioning assumptions, checking edge cases, and stress-testing our examples. We build rigor into the process rather than hoping for it.

Updates & corrections

Business rules, fees, and filing procedures change—sometimes quietly and mid-year. We timestamp major edits, regularly review our most popular pages, and publish clear notes about significant changes so you know what's current.

Spot something that looks off? Tell us about it. We investigate legitimate concerns quickly and fix pages when needed, because when people count on our information, speed matters.

How we choose topics that serve readers

We don't chase viral content or write articles just for clicks. We focus on answering the questions that keep founders up at night, and we write to help you take action—not just stay informed.

Reader intent first

Every piece starts with a specific goal (like forming an LLC, choosing a registered agent, or budgeting for state fees) and ends with clear next steps, trade-offs you should consider, and real examples. When the honest answer is “it depends,” we show you exactly what it depends on and how to make that decision.

We draw from real experience working with founders and reviewing filings across different states, turning those patterns into practical guidance that helps you avoid expensive mistakes.

What we don't publish

We don't do advertorials, pay-to-play roundups, or publish claims we can't verify. If a topic lacks solid evidence or real value for readers, we pass on it.

For complex, fact-specific situations (like multi-state tax issues or regulated industries), we avoid broad generalizations and point you toward professionals instead—because bad advice in those areas costs real money.

Plain English, precise meaning

We use straightforward language and explain terms as we go, but we don't water down the important details. When a filing method is faster but less private—or vice versa—we spell out that trade-off clearly.

We include examples and checklists where they help, and we cut jargon unless it's legally necessary (in which case we translate it and cite our sources).

Editorial governance, transparency, and ethics

Editorial decisions stay with the editorial team, and we handle conflicts openly.

Roles and accountability

As a team, we set standards for accuracy and independence. Our editors enforce those standards, writers document every claim they make, fact-checkers verify sources, and Aaron Kra provides specialist oversight on complex topics. For every page, someone has final responsibility.

We also maintain internal records of why we chose or rejected each partner, so future editors can understand our reasoning—good decisions need context.

Conflicts and ethics

When we have a financial relationship with a provider, we disclose it clearly on the relevant page and evaluate that service using the same standards as everyone else. Editorial independence isn't just a marketing phrase for us—it's an actual rule.

When business interests clash with editorial principles, editorial wins. If that costs us revenue, so be it. Our credibility is the asset we protect above all else.

Not legal or tax advice

We create educational content to help you understand your options, fees, and potential consequences, but we're not your lawyer or accountant.

For advice specific to your situation and location, consult a licensed professional. Our references to agencies like the SBA or IRS support general learning, not case-specific guidance.

How to request a correction

If something looks wrong or outdated, the quickest way to reach us is through our contact page. We review legitimate reports promptly and post visible updates for significant fixes so you know exactly what changed.

We also welcome suggestions about edge cases or topics we should cover—when they'd help other readers, we add them to our update plans.