Utah LLC Operating Agreement: § 48-3a-112 + Free Template (2026)

| Updated April 29, 2026

Utah doesn't require an LLC operating agreement. The catch: § 48-3a-102(16) treats oral, implied, and written agreements as equally binding, so Title 48's defaults fill every gap a silent agreement leaves.

Free Utah Templates

Download Boost Suite’s free Utah LLC Operating Agreement template

Choose the version that matches your Utah LLC structure and download it in PDF or Word format. Each template is designed to help you document ownership, management, and internal rules more clearly from day one.

Utah Single-Member Operating Agreement - Free Updated Template for 2026
Preview of the Utah single-member operating agreement template
Single-Member Operating Agreement
Multi-Member Operating Agreement
Manager-Managed Operating Agreement

What Utah law actually says about operating agreements

Utah's LLC statute doesn't make an operating agreement a condition of formation. The Utah Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act sits in Title 48, Chapter 3a. To form a Utah LLC, you file a Certificate of Organization with the Utah Department of Commerce, Division of Corporations and Commercial Code. No private contract required.

But the moment any agreement exists between members, Utah Code Ann. § 48-3a-112 controls how it operates. The statute treats the agreement as the governing document for internal affairs: relations among members, rights and duties of managers, and the activities of the LLC itself. Where the agreement says nothing, Title 48 fills the gap.

Utah Code Ann. § 48-3a-102(16): an operating agreement is the agreement of all members, including a sole member, that may be “oral, implied, in a record, or in any combination thereof.”

That definition is the foundation of every default rule below. It's also why Utah ranks among the trickier states for verbal handshake deals between business partners.

The default rules that take over without a written agreement

If a Utah LLC's operating agreement is silent on a topic, Title 48 kicks in. Three defaults catch first-time owners off guard most often: per-capita distributions, equal voting weight regardless of contribution, and the unanimous-consent rule for new members.

Per-capita distributions under § 48-3a-404

Under § 48-3a-404, interim distributions before dissolution must be made in equal shares among current members and any persons dissociated as members, regardless of capital contribution. Capital accounts don't enter the formula. The per-capita rule is the single biggest distribution trap in Utah's statute.

Concrete example: a two-member LLC. One member contributes $90,000, the other $10,000. The OA doesn't address distributions. Under Utah's default, both members are entitled to 50% of every distribution. That adds up fast for the larger contributor.

The fix is a single sentence in the operating agreement specifying that distributions track ownership percentages or capital contributions. Without it, the statute wins.

Equal voting rights and unanimous-consent thresholds under § 48-3a-407

Utah Code § 48-3a-407 gives each member equal voting rights in management. Ordinary-course matters get decided by majority vote. Anything outside the ordinary course, plus any amendment to the operating agreement itself, requires unanimous consent.

Two practical consequences: voting weight isn't tied to ownership percentage unless the OA says so, and a single member can block any major decision in a multi-member LLC. Investors expecting weighted votes need to override the default.

Admission of new members requires unanimous consent

Under § 48-3a-401(3)(c), if the operating agreement is silent, every existing member must agree before a new member joins. One holdout blocks the admission. Most operating agreements override this with a majority or supermajority threshold to keep the LLC functional during ownership changes.

Field Note
Aaron Kra's Utah Per-Capita Distribution Trap

I’ve reviewed Utah operating agreements where two members put in wildly uneven capital, $90,000 versus $10,000, and never addressed distributions in writing. Six months later, when the LLC reached its first profitable quarter, the smaller contributor was still legally entitled to half of the money. Under Utah Code § 48-3a-404, the default rule does not care what the spreadsheet says.

Capital Member A $90,000

One member funds most of the LLC.

Capital Member B $10,000

The other contributes far less.

Default Outcome 50 / 50

If the agreement is silent, distributions are split equally.

My recommendation

If even one dollar of capital is uneven, I recommend overriding Utah’s per-capita distribution rule in writing on day one. That one clause can prevent a completely avoidable dispute the moment the LLC starts making money.

Oral and implied operating agreements: Utah's quiet liability

Utah's definition of operating agreement (oral, implied, in a record, or any combination) creates a problem most other states don't have. A casual conversation, an email exchange, or a repeated payout pattern can become a binding operating agreement in a Utah court, even when nobody signed anything.

Two scenarios show how this happens:

  • Email thread example: three founders discuss profit splits in a Slack channel and one writes “let's just do 33/33/34 for now.” No formal agreement is ever drafted. Two years later, one founder argues for 50/25/25 based on workload. Utah courts can treat the original message as an implied operating agreement under § 48-3a-102(16).
  • Course-of-dealing example: a two-member LLC pays each owner $5,000 monthly for 18 months without a written distribution clause. One member then unilaterally cuts the other's draw. The 18-month pattern can be treated as an implied agreement, and the unilateral cut may breach it.

The mitigation is straightforward: include an integration clause (sometimes called a merger clause) at the end of the written operating agreement. It states that the document supersedes all prior or contemporaneous oral, written, or implied understandings. Utah-licensed practitioners at firms like Parsons Behle & Latimer recommend explicit integration language for exactly this reason.

Field Warning
Aaron Kra's Utah Oral-Agreement Risk

In my time advising LLC owners across multiple states, I’ve found that Utah disputes have a very specific flavor: text-message screenshots and email threads often end up as Exhibit A. Because Utah law recognizes oral and implied operating agreements, almost anything members said about money, management, or internal authority can later be argued as binding.

Utah Risk Exhibit A

I treat informal communications in a Utah LLC much more seriously than most owners do. A casual email, a text exchange, or a repeated understanding between members can become part of the legal record when the operating agreement is silent or incomplete.

What usually gets pulled into the dispute
  • text-message screenshots between members
  • email threads about profit splits or authority
  • informal statements about who controls money or management
  • past conversations that were never folded into a final written agreement
What I recommend putting in writing
  • an integration clause in the operating agreement
  • the date of the written agreement
  • clear language stating the written agreement supersedes everything before it
  • a single signed version kept in the LLC records

Member-managed vs. manager-managed under Utah Code § 48-3a-407

Utah LLCs are member-managed by default. To flip into manager-managed, the operating agreement must use specific trigger language: “manager-managed,” “managed by managers,” “management is vested in managers,” or words of similar import. Naming someone a “manager” without that language doesn't change the structure.

Member-managed default rules

Each member has equal management rights. Ordinary-course decisions go to majority vote. Extraordinary acts (sale of substantially all assets, mergers, dissolution) and OA amendments need unanimous consent. The fiduciary duties of loyalty and care, plus the obligation of good faith and fair dealing, apply to every member acting on behalf of the LLC under § 48-3a-409.

Manager-managed: how authority and fiduciary duties shift

In a manager-managed Utah LLC, day-to-day decisions sit with the designated manager(s). Members still vote on extraordinary acts. The fiduciary duties shift primarily to managers, and members who aren't managers generally don't owe fiduciary duties just by virtue of holding an interest. That makes manager-managed structures attractive for passive investors.

Switching from member-managed to manager-managed (or back) is an OA amendment, so default rules require every member's signature. Plan for this when raising outside capital. Boost Suite's step-by-step Utah LLC formation guide walks through how to flag your management choice on the Certificate of Organization.

Who can bind the LLC: the § 48-3a-301 tension

Most consumer pages skip the agency rule. Worth flagging: under § 48-3a-301, a member is not an agent of the LLC solely by reason of being a member. Even in a member-managed LLC where members run operations, that member doesn't automatically have authority to sign contracts on the LLC's behalf.

Utah law-firm commentary flags this tension between the management default and the agency rule. In practice, every Utah operating agreement should include an authority-and-signature clause that names who can bind the LLC, what dollar threshold triggers co-signature, and how the LLC formally delegates signing power.

Feature Member-managed (default) Manager-managed (must opt in)
Daily operations All members, equal rights Designated manager(s)
Extraordinary acts All members must agree All members must still agree
Fiduciary duties Members owe them Managers owe them; non-manager members generally exempt
Default authority to bind Not automatic (§ 48-3a-301) Manager has agency power
Statute trigger language None needed OA must use specific opt-in language

What every Utah LLC operating agreement should include

A workable Utah operating agreement covers the items below. Each clause exists to either override a default rule, document an internal arrangement, or protect against the oral-OA risk.

  • LLC name, purpose, and principal office: match the name exactly as filed on the Certificate of Organization. If the LLC operates under a DBA (assumed name), list that too. Run Boost Suite's Utah business entity search tool to verify name availability and registration status before signing.
  • Member identification and capital contributions: list every member, their address, and what each contributed (cash, property, services).
  • Ownership percentages and capital accounts: state each member's ownership percentage clearly, even in a single-member LLC.
  • Profit and loss allocation: override the per-capita rule from § 48-3a-404 if distributions should track ownership.
  • Distributions and timing: specify when, how, and on what basis distributions get paid.
  • Voting rights and decision thresholds: define ordinary-course versus extraordinary acts, and the vote needed for each.
  • Management structure and authority to bind: state member-managed or manager-managed using statutory trigger language, then name who can sign for the LLC.
  • Admission, withdrawal, and buy-out mechanics: override the default unanimous-consent rule for new members if needed; address valuation on exit.
  • Transfer restrictions and right of first refusal: regulate how membership interests can move; the default lets a transferee receive distributions but not management rights.
  • Dissolution triggers: sync with the Certificate of Organization (see the 2024 § 48-3a-701 update below).
  • Indemnification and advancement of expenses: track § 48-3a-408 and don't try to waive bad-faith conduct.
  • Dispute resolution: mediation, arbitration, venue selection (Utah state courts), and attorney-fee shifting.
  • Integration / merger clause: the Utah-specific safeguard against oral and implied agreements.
  • Amendment procedure: the default is unanimous consent; most OAs lower this to majority or supermajority.

One thing worth flagging: under § 48-3a-112(3)–(4), the operating agreement can't waive the duty of loyalty, the duty of care, or the contractual obligation of good faith and fair dealing. It also can't exonerate a member or manager for bad-faith, willful, or reckless conduct. Any clause that tries gets struck down.

Form your Utah LLC with Northwest and set a stronger foundation

After drafting your operating agreement, Northwest can help you file your Utah LLC, keep your formation details organized, and start your business with clear compliance support.

Single-member and multi-member LLCs: same statute, different drafting

Single-member Utah LLCs benefit from a written operating agreement even though the statute expressly accepts an agreement of a sole member. Most Utah banks won't open business accounts without one. Courts look at the document during veil-piercing analysis to see whether the LLC was actually treated as separate from the owner. The agreement also locks in capital contributions and tax elections in writing, so there's a clear paper trail when the IRS asks.

Multi-member LLCs face a different drafting calculus. The per-capita distribution rule, the unanimous-consent default for new members, and the equal-voting default all collide with how investors typically expect things to work.

Two-member LLCs need a tie-breaking mechanism (rotating chair, third-party mediator, or a defined dispute clause), since 50/50 deadlocks are common. Multi-member exit provisions also need to address valuation, payout timing, and what happens if a member dies or becomes incapacitated. Pairing the OA with the right Utah registered agent helps maintain the corporate formalities veil-piercing case law looks for.

Drafting your Utah operating agreement step by step

Drafting from scratch is faster than most owners expect once the framework is clear. The six steps below cover the core sequence Utah practitioners follow for both single-member and multi-member LLCs.

Utah LLC operating agreement drafting workflow illustration
  1. Confirm your management structure: pick member-managed or manager-managed before drafting. The OA's exact language is what triggers each. Naming someone “manager” without the right phrasing won't flip the LLC out of the member-managed default.
  2. Document capital and ownership: list every member, what they contributed, and their ownership percentage. Override the per-capita rule here if contributions are uneven.
  3. Define profit, loss, and distribution rules: specify who gets what and when. Tie distributions to ownership percentage rather than relying on the equal-shares default.
  4. Set voting and approval thresholds: define ordinary course versus extraordinary acts. Lower the unanimous-consent threshold for routine actions like admitting new members. Build in tie-breaking for two-member LLCs.
  5. Add Utah-specific safeguards: integration clause, dissolution triggers synced with the Certificate of Organization, charging-order language under § 48-3a-503, and a clear authority-to-bind clause to address the § 48-3a-301 tension. This is where you'll spend the most drafting time.
  6. Sign, store, and update: every member signs and dates. Keep the executed copy with corporate records, alongside the EIN confirmation letter from the IRS and any DBA filings. Boost Suite's breakdown of what a Utah LLC actually costs to maintain covers the recurring expenses that often trigger OA updates.

Form your Utah LLC with Bizee after your agreement is ready

Once your operating agreement structure is clear, Bizee can help you file your Utah LLC, organize formation details, and move from draft documents to an active business.

Filing context: how Utah's costs and timelines shape your agreement

The operating agreement doesn't get filed with the state, but it interacts with the Certificate of Organization at several points. Knowing the filing environment helps draft an OA that won't conflict with public records.

Item Utah requirement (2026)
Formation document Certificate of Organization
Filing fee $59
Online processing Often instant; otherwise 2–4 business days
Mail processing 3–7 business days; $75 expedite available
Annual Renewal fee $18
Annual Renewal due Last day of the LLC's anniversary month
Late renewal fee $10
Publication requirement None
Filing authority Utah Department of Commerce, Division of Corporations and Commercial Code

Source: Utah Division of Corporations current fee schedule (effective July 1, 2025). Boost Suite's deep-dive on Utah LLC processing times broken down by method compares online, mail, and expedited options in detail.

The 2024 amendment to § 48-3a-701 (effective July 1, 2024) changed how dissolution triggers work. Dissolution events can now sit in either the Certificate of Organization or the operating agreement, not just the OA. If the two documents conflict, the LLC has a problem nobody wants to litigate.

Field Compliance
Aaron Kra's Utah Dissolution-Trigger Sync Check

The 2024 amendment to Utah Code § 48-3a-701 caught a lot of Utah practitioners off guard, and most consumer-facing operating agreement templates still have not updated for it. I have seen Certificates of Organization that list specific dissolution events while the operating agreement says something different. That is now a real conflict under Utah law.

Updated Rule 2024

Dissolution-related language can now appear in the public filing, the operating agreement, or both. That means the private document should not be drafted in isolation from what the Utah Division of Corporations filing screen actually asks for.

Public Filing
Certificate of Organization

May include dissolution-related fields or specific dissolution events shown during the Utah Division of Corporations filing process.

Private Contract
Operating Agreement

Should mirror those fields, stay consistent with them, or expressly defer to the Certificate where needed.

My drafting sequence before finalizing the OA
  • Check what dissolution-related fields the Utah Division of Corporations filing screen actually presents.
  • Compare those fields against the draft operating agreement before members sign anything.
  • Mirror the Certificate language or expressly defer to it inside the agreement itself.
My recommendation

I always review the Certificate of Organization before drafting the dissolution section. If the public filing and the operating agreement do not match, I revise the OA immediately so the LLC does not carry a preventable conflict in its core records.

When to update or amend your Utah operating agreement

Trigger events for an amendment:

  • New member admitted or existing member exits: the ownership table changes, voting math shifts, and capital accounts won't match the original signed copy.
  • Capital contribution change or ownership percentage shift: any rebalance needs to be on paper.
  • Switch between member-managed and manager-managed: requires updated trigger language and an authority-to-bind revision.
  • Material change in profit/loss allocation: if the LLC moves from per-capita to ownership-weighted distributions, or vice versa.
  • Tax election change: an S-corp election via IRS Form 2553 or entity classification election via Form 8832 affects how distributions and salaries get treated. Boost Suite's review of vetted Utah LLC formation services covers providers that bundle ongoing tax-election support.
  • Statutory change: the 2024 § 48-3a-701 dissolution amendment is a recent example.

Default amendment rule: every member must consent. The OA itself can set a lower threshold (majority or supermajority), which is what most active LLCs end up doing. Don't forget to date the amendment and have all consenting members sign the same document.

Download Boost Suite’s free Utah LLC Operating Agreement template (PDF & Word):

Choose the version that fits your LLC structure.

Single-Member

Multi-Member

Manager-Managed

Utah LLC operating agreement: answers to common questions

These are the questions that come up most often from Utah LLC owners drafting their first operating agreement. Answers reflect the 2026 fee schedule and the 2024 amendment to Title 48.

Is an operating agreement required in Utah?

No. Utah law doesn't require it as a condition of formation. But once any agreement exists between members, oral or written, § 48-3a-112 makes it the controlling document for internal affairs, and Title 48 fills in every gap a silent agreement leaves.

Does Utah recognize an oral operating agreement?

Yes, and that's the trap. Under § 48-3a-102(16), an operating agreement can be oral, implied, in a record, or any combination. A written agreement with an integration clause is the only reliable way to lock out prior verbal understandings.

Do I file my Utah operating agreement with the state?

No. The agreement is internal to the LLC. Only the Certificate of Organization gets filed with the Utah Division of Corporations and Commercial Code. Keep the signed OA with your corporate records.

Can a single-member Utah LLC have an operating agreement?

Yes. Utah's definition explicitly covers an agreement of a sole member. A signed OA strengthens veil-piercing protection and is often required for business banking, even when there's only one owner.

What's the default profit split if my Utah operating agreement is silent?

Per-capita: equal shares across all members regardless of capital contribution. § 48-3a-404 controls. If one member contributed $90,000 and another contributed $10,000, both are entitled to 50% of distributions unless the operating agreement says otherwise.

How do I change my Utah operating agreement after the LLC is formed?

Default rules require every member to consent. The OA itself can set a lower threshold (majority or supermajority), which is the more practical setup. Amendments should be documented in writing, signed and dated by every consenting member, and stored with the original agreement.

Research and References

Build your Utah LLC the right way with Harbor Compliance

Harbor Compliance helps you form your Utah LLC, organize key compliance steps, and stay prepared beyond your operating agreement.

  • Aaron Kra Boost Suite

    Aaron Kra, JD, Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Boost Suite, is a recognized authority on LLC formation, registered agents, and small-business compliance.
    A graduate of the University of Texas School of Law (ABA-accredited), he founded Boost Suite to turn complex state rules into plain-English, step-by-step guidance. For 9+ years, he has helped entrepreneurs with entity selection, registered-agent requirements, and multi-state compliance, and he leads the site’s legal/tax review.


    Previously, Aaron practiced business law in Austin (LLC/PLLC formations, conversions/domestications, UCC-1 filings, multi-state registrations) and completed a year-long secondment with a national registered-agent provider, working with filing clerks in 25+ states. At Boost Suite, he checks each guide with official US sources and updates everything when necessary. Read moreAUTHTOROIRN about Aaron Kra and Boost Suite.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this page is for general educational purposes only and should not be considered legal or tax advice. Laws and regulations differ by state or country, may change over time, and always depend on your personal circumstances. The comments section is designed for readers to share insights and personal experiences, but these do not replace professional guidance. For personalized advice regarding legal or tax matters, please consult with a licensed attorney, CPA, or qualified advisor. To learn how we select partners, vet sources, and keep content accurate, see our editorial policy.